1. Contests and Customer Relationships

    Tuesday, 21 Jul 2009 View Comments Posted by: Sean McDonald

    Sweepstakes and Contests continue in our marketing toolkit because the brand achieves the goal to get large groups of people to act in prescribed manner. My perspective is sweepstakes and contests are like heroin, it is a short term fix. A brand spends money (for prizes, media, and creative), gets excitement for brief period; then the euphoria dies down, until the next contest.

    What brands usually want and how they achieve it is still disjointed. Brands say they want long term, solid relationships with customers. Contests are not the type of achievement you should be putting in your trophy case. Brands that use a lot of contests create one positive relationship for the winner and nothing for the thousands of participants. How many of us have entered a contest, lost, then felt more positive about the brand hosting the contest? The only people that come back for seconds to a brand for the next contest, are the truly desperate consumers (want something for free) and small children (don’t know any better).

    Sweepstakes and Contests do have a purpose – i.e., build awareness, but too often can be panacea for lack of a customer relationship and just a quick way to build your email list or twitter followers.

    • I agree w/you in the sense that contests are inherently tactical and are the marketing equivalent of junk food (or heroin, your choice). What's attractive to brands about contests is that they make the needle move (unless they totally suck) and sometimes that's not without value, especially when cash for long-term, strategic initiatives is sorely lacking and brand managers' job security on the line.

      Contests can also be valuable from a positioning perspective in galvanizing an existing audience around a set of ideas or values, or reaching out to a new audience with a message that says 'we're about what you're about' which is beyond simply raising awareness.

      Ideally, contests are used as part of a wider initiative to generate a quick burst of energy, but too often they ARE the initiative and the only thing people are left with is a shiny wrapper.
    • alex
      Agree.Contests can be a part of a larger customer engagement plan. But too often are the start and end of the customer engagement b/c it drives a spike in demand and awareness.
    • Sean, what is your opinion on McDonnald's repeated used of the Monopoly sweepstakes year after year. Considering McDonald's target demographic, their brand interaction and experience as well as ongoing purchase behavior could you argue that this has hurt the brand?

      Also, note this point:
      http://www.nytimes.com/1995/12/08/us/donor-turn...

      In 1995, St. Jude's Children's Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee received an anonymous letter postmarked Dallas, Texas, containing a $1 million winning game piece. Although game rules prohibited the transfer of prizes, McDonald's waived the rule and has made the annual $50,000 installments.
    • neilbeam
      McDonalds is a transactional brand that does extermely well because they provide consistent quality and experience (each of us rate the quality as high or low). With a transactional brand, contests are used to drive spikes in demand - it inflates the demand for a period of time, but costs $$$ in th process. Because McDonald's offers me a chance to win a $1Million does not improve my relationship with their brand/restaurant, but can drive a spike in my purchase of their food for period of time. I believe McDonald's can benefit from increased word of mouth from friends of ours that remind us to eat at McDonalds or suggest we try the new McSandwich. So the contest does not hurt the brand, but don't believe it helps it either except for short demand spurts that erupt and erode once the contest ends.
    blog comments powered by Disqus